09 July, 2012

Cunning ways to catch a fox...

The more vague a prophecy is, the more likely it is correct. Alternately, the more accurate a prediction is, the more likely it is correct. Predictions are based on scientific data, whereas prophecy is based on sensory data at the expense of logic. People who are good at predicting events are extremely logical. People who are good at prophecy are very illogical. Both can be accurate, since logic is not a propos the final determinate of what will happen.

As an example, one sees an approaching storm front. A scientist would predict rain, possible lightening and wind. A prophet would see water, darkness (clouds) interspersed with brilliant lights (lightening). In the western world, one is useful, the other a mere curiosity; one mature in outlook, the other childlike in simplicity. Both are important for determining an outcome, but only one has scientific validity. A scientists would predict preparing with shelter or an umbrella, whereas the prophet would advise a torch or boat, depending on his/her skills.

When it comes to using logical reasoning on future occurrences, what will occur as a predictive event is based on:
  1. knowing what has happened (historical records)
  2. predicting what is likely to happen based on 1)
  3. normalcy bias interpretation of 2)
Normalcy bias is counter-intuitive and takes into account what is limited by our expectations. Normalcy bias limits prophecy. The more one is affected by normalcy bias, the less prophetic one is. Nature has a way of ignoring normalcy bias. Random strangeness occurs commonly in the physical world. But random strangeness is only strange to human perception, not natural states. Bizarre phenomenon are common in nature, from jumping genes, UFOs, ghosts, time warps, lenticular clouds, sun dogs. eternal storms, orange moons, sailing stones, mammatus clouds, light pillars, rains of fish, red rain and fire rainbows. Anyone can look at the unexplained, and given enough information, can find an explanation. But to guess the future is like peering through a foggy looking glass. Knowing what will happen can only be based on experience and interpretation of that experience. As de Lamartine once said, experience is the real prophecy of wise men. Prophesy is mouthed most accurately by poets, who weave their magic in words as subtle and obtuse as possible so as to enchant yet at the same time confuse.

Before his death, Socrates made his first and last prophecy, that Athens would fall to tyranny from within. Athens was already rife with political and financial corruption. It was not a gigantic leap of faith to see what was inevitable for this nation state. Similarly before her curse, Cassandra prophesied the fall of Troy, though no one believed her when she mentioned that Troy would be felled by a single horse (i.e. the Trojan Horse). Even the Buddha made a famous prophetic remark that Buddhism would only last 500 years if nuns were ordained. Anyone who is not poetic cannot channel the muse of timeless motion, not even the Buddha. Not because saints cannot see into the future but because they usually refrain from doing so, fraught as it is with the inaccuracies of quantum mechanics.

Most people use predictive reasoning when it comes to foretelling what will happen in the near future. Economists, for example, can speculate on what is happening based on flowcharts. Medicos can speculate based on statistics and patient vitals. But the greatest difficulty in prophesy is the effect known as interference. Interference is a karmic property where benevolent or malevolent energies can directly affect the future in a positive or negative way. Cabalists know this. Saints know this. Any act of either positive or negative karma upsets the future permanently. One of the hardest lessons I have personally had to learn is that evil men are as equally intelligent as good men. The main distinction I have found is that evil cunning is based on personal gain rather than the gain for the greater good. Inevitably, selfish acts are self-destructive, as is seen with the current disintegration of the corrupt financial system. But remember that even a trapped fox will bite off his own leg to escape a trap. Thus we cannot assume the collapse of a global economy is any different to the Cabal eating off its own foot.

Putting normalcy bias aside, one can prophesy an alternate present day where well known and reported truths have been suppressed for ulterior financial motives. Of these, we could include a number of social events that have been suppressed as a result of resident evil within society. These include:
  1. A radioactive planet - the use of uranium in nuclear reactors instead of thorium, primarily because uranium is excavated for military use and is expensive to mine (i.e. mining profits)
  2. A cannibal cabal that has withstood the failed assassination of  King Phillip IV of France in 1307, the failed suppression of the Jesuits in 1773, the end of Nazi domination through WWII only to re-materialise in the USA via Operation Paperclip.
  3. Suppression of Tesla energy devices
  4. Promotion of live-attenuated vaccines against manageable non-threatening or enzootic diseases

Predictive scenarios at present indicate an implosion of global banking. Whether or not this is a good thing is still a moot point and will not be completely understood until mid 2013. The downfall of corrupt banksters aside, some insiders, such as Rev. Lindsey Williams, have predicted the November 2012 global financial crisis is being delicately orchestrated by the cabal to coincide with the 2012 USA elections and a third world war following bankruptcy of all world currencies. Others have interpreted these as well as other events as evidence of a collapsing of the Cabal. Any event can be observed from many points of view. And simply viewing it can alter the outcome. 

The easiest way to catch a fox is to rely on his hunger to ensnare him. The bait is our compassion (or our 'soft meat' if we consider the tortoise in the fable about the tortoise and the fox). We then entice them into the deep waters (the stilled or peaceful mind of legal truth) and allow them to drown in their own folly. No force is required. No violence. 

One thing is for sure - a deluge is coming for the fox, watched by the wise men above (see below).

04 July, 2012

Reconditioning the hologram

Michael Talbot was the first scientist to popularise the notion of holographic consciousness, although he wasn't the first scientist to report it academically. First proposed by Gerard 't Hooft, it was given a precise string-theory interpretation by Leonard Susskind, inspired by black hole thermodynamics. Metaphysicians and philosophers have since run with this idea, incorporating it into their spiritual paradigms, which encompasses both spiritual and metaphysical constructs.  David Icke popularised the concept even further when he pointed out to the general public that dissecting holograms into minute particles does not diminish the image; that the rose is contained within every pixel of the whole image. This has strengthened the general notion of 'as above, see below.' The idea that what appears outside of ourselves is a reflection of what is happening within our consciousness is a concept as old as humanity. Within our unit of consciousness is contained the entire universe of collective consciousness. If we had the capacity to understand this, we would have total unity consciousness.

Milarepa, the famous singing prophet of Tibetan Buddhism, was famously quoted as having seen a malevolent alien outside his cave one day. His response was to surrender himself to it, saying 'you can have my body but not my soul.' In that moment of physical surrender and spiritual defiance, he realised that this malevolent being was in fact an aspect of himself (Maya) which he had to overcome or surrender to. In doing so, he attained complete enlightenment, and devoted the rest of his life to spreading the dharma (the way of truth). Milarepa did not say that alien creatures or UFOs do not exist but that some of what appears as external entities are in fact inner mental afflictions that affect our perception of the true reality.

What I wish to remark about this insight gained by Milarepa is that there is a clear delineation between what are real and what are inherent (inner) entities within universal consciousness. The distinction between the two can be so subtle that most people cannot distinguish the two. The famous line 'do you see it too?' in the movie 'A Beautiful Mind' illustrates the importance of validation. Professor John Nash is greeted by a stranger after a lecture. This stranger informs Nash that he has been nominated for the Nobel Prize in economics. Troubled by schizophrenia most of his life, Nash finds this absurd notion difficult to reconcile and is immediately suspicious of its reality and that the stranger before him is noting but a ghost. To confirm or deny the presence of the stranger as a 'real' man or ghost, Nash asks one of his students who is standing beside him if he too sees this man. Once the student validated the Nobel Committee representative, Nash went on to listen to what he had to say.

One's ego can obviously cloud sensory perceptions (seeing, hearing, smelling) and only vigilance can help us differentiate what we are sensing compared to what we are merely imagining. The same conundrum exists in spiritual channeling and spiritual circles where mediumship allows one to see all sorts of entities that must be confirmed by others who can moderate the seer's visions. Without vigilance and moderation, one's perceptions can quickly lead one to make false assumptions. One can safely conclude (as I do from personal experience) that malevolent entities, ghosts and aliens do in fact exist, but that does not distinguish them from being aspect of one's self. So how do we tell the difference between inner ghosts and outer ghosts, in spite of them coexisting in the same unity consciousness? Paradoxically, all people, objects, ghosts, UFOs and malevolent beings are aspects of one's consciousness. They are all manifestations of each person's mind, but at the same time are external 'separate' aspects of the greater unity consciousness. How does this integrate with reality? Or more importantly, how do we know what to do about it?

If we follow the lengthy paper-trail of UFOlogy reports and even data released by the CIA and NASA recently, it is evident that are massive body of circumstantial evidence attests to the likelihood of UFOs being a part of unity consciousness both on this planet and off-world. Regular citings are reported on a weekly basis by expert witnesses. Some are later recognised as IFOs, but a percentage remain UFOs. UFOs can been seen flying through the sky, and researchers such as Richard Dolan confirm their presence through well documented evidence. Carl Jung remarked rather evasively that UFOs are an aspect of the shadow archetype of one's ego, but what this means is they can only be seen by those subconsciously 'primed' to see them. Those who do not believe, will only see shadows. When deniers are confronted with a glaringly opposing reality, they often dismiss or refute the obvious. Denial is the ultimate method of massaging reality in those who ignore the real world. When the tall European tall ships first approached the early Native Americans, it was such an ‘impossible’ vision in their reality that their highly filtered perceptions couldn’t register what was happening, and the villagers literally failed to ‘see’ the ships. Cognitive dissonance leads to only two outcomes - reconditioning the mind or cognitive dissonance.

UFO sightings are taken as given by this writer, despite M$M using their tactics of 'debunking and debilitating'. The take home message is that our view of reality is hard-wired from birth due to conditioning. Some people have the fortune of being conditioned from birth to expect the unexpected while others only see what they have always seen. To see only what has been seen before is a fictional narrative of the mind. Though truth is stranger than fiction, it still remains the truth.

A reconditioning of consciousness is paramount to facing these times of rapidly changing tenets of reality, when even the basic rules of physics change on a daily basis. I was born into a world where Newton's and Einstein's laws were a given, but these are being reconstructed in light of new physics; God-particles, string theory, vanishing matter and more.

What we must adhere to as a philosophy is rigorous investigative study and the courage to embrace often painful rethinking of our attitudes in the face of a burgeoning influx of new consciousness arising upon the planet in the shape of shiny circular craft that defy, deny and delight the many human observers of what is a complex holographic universe within and without.